I don't usually have projects open in all five Affinity apps at the same time, & none of my Affinity Publisher projects are very large, but aside from some things taking a little longer than usual, it all works surprisingly well. This is not a solution, it's at best a workaround.įWIW , I sometimes have Safari plus all three betas & both retail apps running at the same time on my old iMac (specs below in my sig). With the "Edit in Photo" option I can at least do the latter in an easier way, but it forces Publisher to close the file for the hand over. Change outside and update in a loop until ready. In the same way it's hard with linked resource updating if I want all photos on a page to match a specific style/theme. Can I get with two clicks (one on the Persona, another on the tool) to my Inpainting brush to fix that or will I have to look up the linked resource out of a folder with 200 of it, fix it there and update it in Publisher? Think of this. I look through a nearly finished photo book and spot a blemish on one photo I missed before. I think the Personas and their tight integration will speed up the workflow. I suspect even low end computers to be able running all three apps in parralel as I find Affinity apps to be quite efficient on resources (with the little exception of Publishers current memory problem). I don't think it has something to do with the computers performance. As long as the files were fully compatible and rendered correctly (and I believe they already are), we would be just happy. But yeah, if they quietly dropped it, no one in the DTP community would bat an eye. That doesn't mean that said marquee feature, a seamless and elegant continuum between apps and file formats, won't come to pass sooner rather than later. – not to mention a multi-line composer clone, but I fully accept that to take multiple years to be available), because being able to do your projects in a less-than-super-elegant but timely way beats not being able to do them at all in a cutthroat environment with crazy deadlines, stupid clients who drag their feet and whatnot, and I'm betting the Serif guys are hard at work on those features as we speak. I'd gladly trade that feature over the other missing ones I've mentioned time and time again (proper master page support, anchored object support, global layers, etc. Editing stuff inline or having a nice little shortcut is most definitely *not* a serious omission, and it's not what's holding Publisher's release back, either. I know I may be in the minority here when it comes to Designer, but I can assure you that when it comes to Publisher, an app squarely aimed at the InDesign and QuarkXPress camp, I'm not. On the other hand, I can appreciate the fact that said Persona exists probably segregates pixel editing features further than in Illustrator, thus simplifying the main Vector Persona by comparison, which is a great thing in my book, so I know I'm definitely reaping the benefits of a feature I don't even actively use that much. Yes, it surely can come in handy for illustrators, but it really wouldn't bother me personally if that feature wasn't there… As a regular old graphic designer, I like keeping my vector and pixel editing apps as separate as possible, thank you very much. In fact, I don't even know how those Personas will behave kind of like a “lite” version of each of the other apps, and also like how when you double click on an embedded or linked file in later versions of CS and CC the corresponding app loads up?Īs for the other apps, I personally use Designer and Photo, sometimes in the same project, and I rarely if ever use the Pixel persona in Designer. The whole Designer/Photo Persona thing *is* quite overrated in Publisher, especially for professional users who own Macs and PCs powerful enough to have all three apps loaded simultaneously and are already used to have their linked stuff on a separate folder and to open it up manually. Not to sound like an old fart, but I'd say that that “other more serious problem” you've mentioned is the least of Serif's worries, and not very serious at all if you really think about it. This means that you should not attempt to use it for commercial purposes or for any other activity where you may be adversely affected by the application failing, including the total loss of any documents."Īnd the other - and more serious - problem is that you can't yet change between the applications (Affinity Designer & Affinity Photo) when working on an Affinity Publisher document. "As this is a beta it is considered to be not suitable for production use.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |